Blog

i'm NOT excited for starcraft II

a painted over original Starcraft with a few new units, and old favorites stripped away.

by HiP FLasK

So more than 10 years ago Blizzard came out with Starcraft and the world rejoiced in RTS bliss. Some of my fondest memories of childhood came LANing Starcraft in my friend's basement. I remember the first time I played Starcraft and was just blown away by the fact that the little pictures were moving for the units portraits. Eventually though, as with most games, we all got tired of it and moved on to something else. Then came Warcraft 3, which again, blew us all away. It seemed that Blizzard was in the forefront of innovating genres that they helped solidify in the first place. It was that innovation from Warcraft 3 that kept me so enthralled with it. While not as big of game on the international tournament scene as Starcraft, my friends and I still play Warcraft 3 to this day. With the announcement of Starcraft 2 I expected this same level of innovative design that came from Warcraft 2 - Starcraft and from Starcraft - Warcraft 3, what I got instead was a painted over original Starcraft with a few new units, and old favorites stripped away. Essentially what I saw, was a more expensive expansion pack. I'll admit, I'm biased towards the ideas of Heroes in my RTS game. I love the combination of RPG and RTS, so the fact that they didn't add Heroes into Starcraft was a little upsetting. I can let that slide though, as I understand that a lot of people don't enjoy having Heroe units. Fine. The next thing that was really upsetting was the fact that there was no 4th race. 11 years. 11 years people have been waiting for this game and you don't give us a 4th race? Some Xel Naga, some hybrid protoss zergs, SOMETHING. That to me was the real blow. I kept my hopes up though. I trusted Blizzard because they hadn't let me down yet. I went to the website, checked out their updates on units, watched all the videos I could and tried to keep my excitement up. I was doing a good job of keeping my hype up for Starcraft until I started playing Dawn of War II. I was blown away, here to me was the true successor to Warcraft 3. They were able to take the RTS genre and do away with the tedious aspects and add focus more on the combat. While the game isn't perfect, the ideas that they planted were genius to me and added a whole new experiance. I honestly feel like a kid again when I play the game, thinking back on fond LAN party memories. It also left a sour taste for Starcraft 2 in my mouth. Here was physical proof that you could do more to a genre while keeping it rooted in, well, it's roots. Like I said though, I'm a sucker for Hero units, which Dawn of War II has. Even if you take out the Hero units though, the game still has enough fresh and genre defining ideas that make it a gem. Even just the simple idea of units taking cover on destructable environments gets me excited. I haven't played Starcraft 2 so all this ranting could be misplaced and I could be proven wrong as soon as I touch it. From what I've seen though it just seems like Blizzard is afraid of doing something different and put some new paint on an old model. Maybe I'm also wrong for singleing out Blizzard as well. Take a look at the new Street Fighter. Old model new paint. Is this the standard that the industry is going towards now? Maybe people think it's worth it though. Maybe they're willing to pay 50, 60$ for a game if it looks new and has some minor tweaks that could have been implemented in an expansion years ago. I truly hope not though because it's nice to see companies try out new things and experiment with fresh ideas for genres that can quickly become stale. Even if some of those ideas don't work out, at least they're trying and I have a lot more respect for a company that tries to innovate something than for a company that tries to sell me an 11 year old car as a new one.
Don't even get me started on Diablo III.

Comments
To comment Login or
  • loltim
    loltim

    The truth is, I have NEVER played a blizzard game that i didn't love. So I have very little reason to start doubting them now. When you're making a sequel of a game as widely beloved as Stacraft, you walk a fine line between innovating and preserving what so many people already enjoy. Change too much and you alienate your fan base. Stay too true to form and you get complaints like yours (which are all valid).

    But I'm gonna give Blizzard the benefit of the doubt on this one. They've given me no reason to do otherwise.

    Now, what is your issue with Diablo III?

  • Dominic
    Dominic

    It's hard for me to believe that Blizzard would release Starcraft with just new paint and call it Starcraft 2. The folks at Blizzard are very passionate about the quality of their series, hence why Ghost was canceled. I would say don't get overly critical of the new installment just yet. Wait for it to come out and judge it then.

    I too love heroes. I've probably played more DOTA than Wc3 in my gaming life.

  • HiP FLasK
    HiP FLasK

    the blizzard we knew isn't the blizzard that we know now. it seems like everyone that's made the games we loved when we were younger have up and left. the merger has me worried too. it's hard to judge a game without playing it of course, but just going by what i've seen i'm pretty worried.

  • Coop
    Coop

    Hey, I find it funny that this is the speech I gave you at the World of Warcraft midnight release and you argued.

  • Lordcrash
    Lordcrash

    I was excited about Starcraft II until I saw the devs play a round. The game seriously looked exactly like the original except with updated graphics like you stated above. It's ashame because I remember the good old days where Blizzard was truely innovative, like WC3, the first WC, Blackthorne, Lost Vikings, etc. Now all I see is refniement of their products and not true innovation. Now with their merge with Activision I wonder if we're just going to see rehashed games like for instance the COD series. Don't get me wrong, COD5 is a fantastic game and I love the Zombie mode but the differences between it and previous games are not that much different. I'm hoping Diablo III will be worth my time and the wait, but after reviewing the progress videos, etc. I have a feeling it will not be that much of an improvement over Dialbo II. Plus, with the final patch to Dialbo II coming out soon, hopefully with a lot user recommended updates, I don't see how there will be that much of an improvement at except for of course 3D graphics. Luckily Blizzard never pushes the limits of PC's, thus the success of WoW, so I won't have to break my budget upgrading my PC to play it!

X

Gamervision Login

OR