News
Microsoft Hit With Class-Action Fraud Suit
Hopes to Settle For 1.5 Million Gamerscore Points

Those who follow new media litigation really closely may recognize the name Samuel Lassoff. Back in 2006, Lassoff named Google, Yahoo!, and IAC Interactive Corporation in a class action suit, alleging that “defendants engaged in a scheme to hide its negligent handling of plaintiff's advertising account and never warned plaintiffs of fraudulent clicks or made any recovery efforts for the plaintiffs.” I have no clue what that means, but that suit was eventually thrown out, but Lassoff is back, this time suing Microsoft for "incomplete and/or partial downloads of digital goods and services and refused refund of same." Basically, the Philadelphia-based lawyer paid Microsoft points for some DLC, then had trouble downloading it, but was still charged, stating that "an invoice he received early this month from Microsoft included charges for purchases he couldn't complete due to a balky download system." I don’t know what “balky” means, but it doesn’t sound like a good thing.
The suit is another class action suit, with Lassoff seeking a "full refund to all US consumers of all Microsoft Points fraudulently charged to consumers for incomplete or partial downloads of purchased digital goods and services." All attempts to reach Mr. Lassoff by phone have been met with disconnected numbers and offices who claim he does not work there, but we will continue to try to get in touch with him to discuss this matter. I have some questions…
Comments
I don't get it, doesn't XBL have the redownload for free feature?
Anyway, to address the last class action suit he filed & the quote you posted. What that means is someone ran an online advertising campaign with Google, Yahoo, & IAC (banner ads most likely). Now the success of advertising campaigns is usually based on a Click Through Rate (aka how many people see your ad and then click it). There is a feeling in the industry that big name portals (AOL, Google, Yahoo, etc.) commit a sort of click fraud to make it seem like the advertising campaigns are doing awesome. How they do it I have no idea, but I always get the feeling that Yahoo does it at least. So I assume thats what the suit was about, the advertising not actually reaching real consumers (or at least not to the amount they stated).
I'd like to sue gamervision for discriminating against the blind viewers (DAMN... I meant blind gamers). This vision is not representative of them, and i think only $14 in nickles will make me (DAMN... I meant them! "will make them") feel better.